Plan the route to the next level of care.

A medical transfer involves clinical decisions, transport, receiving capability and communication. The plan needs to connect them.

Illustrative medical response and patient transfer coordination
03 / MEDICAL EVACUATION

More than a transport arrangement

When a patient's needs exceed onsite capability, a clear medical emergency response and evacuation plan provides the framework for escalation. It identifies who makes decisions, which resources may be used and how care is handed over.

Nautilus can develop and manage arrangements linking the onsite medical team, the client's emergency structure, transport providers, receiving hospitals and external assistance partners. Ground and air options are considered according to clinical need, location and available resources.

The key connections

Clinical assessment and escalation

Define the process for assessing the need for transfer, seeking clinical input and activating the agreed response. Decision authority and communication responsibilities belong in the plan.

Suitable transport

Consider ground ambulance, helicopter or fixed-wing coordination where applicable. Patient needs, medical escort requirements, equipment and in-transit support shape the transport decision.

Receiving care

Identify appropriate facilities and referral pathways. Hospital acceptance, available capacity and access to the required specialist care form part of transfer coordination.

Access and logistics

Account for site access, security arrangements, transport availability, permissions and practical constraints. Remote operations may also need alternatives for changes in weather or route availability.

Handover and continuity

Plan the clinical documentation, communication and structured handover that connect the teams involved. Post-transfer follow-up can be included within the agreed scope.

Plan for constraints as well as the preferred route

Distance alone does not describe an evacuation challenge. Terrain, operating conditions, receiving capability and access restrictions can influence what is possible at the time.

A useful plan identifies alternatives when the preferred hospital, route or provider is unavailable. It also distinguishes routine transfers, urgent evacuation and repatriation requirements where relevant to the project.

Our approach to project planning
LET’S START WITH YOUR OPERATION

Questions for the
first conversation.

  1. What care can be provided onsite, and where are its limits?
  2. Which hospitals can provide the higher-level care your project may need?
  3. What ground or air transport options can realistically access the site?
  4. Who has decision authority, and how is the response activated?
  5. What alternatives are available if the primary arrangement is disrupted?
Discuss evacuation planning

Transport and receiving-facility options depend on clinical assessment, availability, operating conditions, permissions and the agreed arrangements. This website does not provide emergency dispatch.